Media Fact Sheet
|
About the Board:
|
The Arizona Regulatory Board of Physician
Assistants licenses and regulates
over 2,050 physician assistants. Of
those, approximately 1,772 practice
in the state.
|
- The Board is comprised of 10 members: 4
physician assistants, 2 allopathic physicians,
2 osteopathic physicians and 2 public
members. The Governor appoints each
Board member.
|
- The Board meets quarterly. Special meetings
may be called when the Board discusses
a Summary Suspension, current legislative
issues, or other pressing discussion
items.
|
| Common Terms Used During Board Meetings:
|
- Formal Interview: A
formal interview is a forum for the
physician assistant to appear before
the Board and discuss the facts of the
case. A physician assistant may choose
whether to attend a formal interview
or have the case heard at a formal hearing.
At the conclusion of a formal interview,
the Board may take disciplinary action
against a physician assistant. The Board
may also choose to issue an advisory
letter or dismiss a case without merit.
|
- Formal Hearing:
Formal hearings are sent to an Administrative
Law Judge (ALJ) at the Office of Administrative
Hearings (OAH). It is a full evidentiary
hearing, like in civil courts. The ALJ
hears the case, makes a recommendation
and refers the case back to the Board
for consideration.
|
- Summary Suspension/Restriction:
A Summary Suspension/Restriction is
an option to immediately suspend or
restrict a physician assistant’s
license to perform healthcare tasks
when the physician assistant poses an
imminent danger to the public health
and safety. If the Board takes this
action, it is required to serve the
physician assistant with a written notice
that states the charges and informs
the licensee that he/she is entitled
to a hearing as expeditiously as possible.
The law regards this as an extraordinary
and punitive state administrative agency
action. Consequently, the Board must
establish and have in its administrative
record substantial and reliable evidence
to support the Board's conclusion that
the physician assistant poses an imminent
danger to the public health and safety.
|
|
|
|